0.09/0.11	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.09/0.11	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.10/0.31	% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
0.10/0.31	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.10/0.31	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.10/0.31	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.10/0.31	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.10/0.31	% WCLimit    : 240
0.10/0.31	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 05:11:34 EDT 2025
0.16/0.31	% CPUTime    : 
0.16/0.44	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.16/0.47	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Z17mk2MtxV/E---3.1_21755.p
0.83/0.60	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
0.83/0.60	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSSNSFA.
0.83/0.60	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.83/0.60	# Starting new_ho_11 with 1200s (5) cores
0.83/0.60	# Starting post_as_ho6 with 240s (1) cores
0.83/0.60	# Starting sh9 with 240s (1) cores
0.83/0.60	# Starting sh5l with 240s (1) cores
0.83/0.60	# post_as_ho6 with pid 21834 completed with status 0
0.83/0.60	# Result found by post_as_ho6
0.83/0.60	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSSNSFA.
0.83/0.60	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.83/0.60	# Starting new_ho_11 with 1200s (5) cores
0.83/0.60	# Starting post_as_ho6 with 240s (1) cores
0.83/0.60	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,2.0,0,3,20000,1.0,true)
0.83/0.60	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLF31-MSFFFSBN
0.83/0.60	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.83/0.60	# Starting new_ho_10 with 130s (1) cores
0.83/0.60	# new_ho_10 with pid 21837 completed with status 0
0.83/0.60	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.83/0.60	# Preprocessing class: HSLSSMSSSSSNSFA.
0.83/0.60	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.83/0.60	# Starting new_ho_11 with 1200s (5) cores
0.83/0.60	# Starting post_as_ho6 with 240s (1) cores
0.83/0.60	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,,true,2.0,0,3,20000,1.0,true)
0.83/0.60	# Search class: HGHSM-FSLF31-MSFFFSBN
0.83/0.60	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total)
0.83/0.60	# Starting new_ho_10 with 130s (1) cores
0.83/0.60	# Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
0.83/0.60	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.83/0.60	
0.83/0.60	# Proof found!
0.83/0.60	# SZS status Theorem
0.83/0.60	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.83/0.60	thf(decl_sort1, type, hF_Mirabelle_hf: $tType).
0.83/0.60	thf(decl_25, type, zero_z189798548lle_hf: hF_Mirabelle_hf).
0.83/0.60	thf(decl_37, type, hF_Mirabelle_hinsert: hF_Mirabelle_hf > hF_Mirabelle_hf > hF_Mirabelle_hf).
0.83/0.60	thf(decl_39, type, hF_Mirabelle_hpair: hF_Mirabelle_hf > hF_Mirabelle_hf > hF_Mirabelle_hf).
0.83/0.60	thf(decl_50, type, x: hF_Mirabelle_hf).
0.83/0.60	thf(decl_51, type, y: hF_Mirabelle_hf).
0.83/0.60	thf(fact_18_hinsert__nonempty, axiom, ![X361:hF_Mirabelle_hf, X1:hF_Mirabelle_hf]:(((hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X361 @ X1)!=(zero_z189798548lle_hf))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Z17mk2MtxV/E---3.1_21755.p', fact_18_hinsert__nonempty)).
0.83/0.60	thf(fact_13_hpair__def, axiom, ((hF_Mirabelle_hpair)=(^[X72:hF_Mirabelle_hf, X73:hF_Mirabelle_hf]:(hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ (hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X72 @ zero_z189798548lle_hf) @ (hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ (hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X72 @ (hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X73 @ zero_z189798548lle_hf)) @ zero_z189798548lle_hf)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Z17mk2MtxV/E---3.1_21755.p', fact_13_hpair__def)).
0.83/0.60	thf(conj_0, conjecture, ((hF_Mirabelle_hpair @ x @ y)!=(zero_z189798548lle_hf)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Z17mk2MtxV/E---3.1_21755.p', conj_0)).
0.83/0.60	thf(c_0_3, plain, ![X361:hF_Mirabelle_hf, X1:hF_Mirabelle_hf]:(((hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X361 @ X1)!=(zero_z189798548lle_hf))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_18_hinsert__nonempty])).
0.83/0.60	thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X797:hF_Mirabelle_hf, X798:hF_Mirabelle_hf]:(((hF_Mirabelle_hpair @ X797 @ X798)=(hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ (hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X797 @ zero_z189798548lle_hf) @ (hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ (hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X797 @ (hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X798 @ zero_z189798548lle_hf)) @ zero_z189798548lle_hf)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_13_hpair__def])])).
0.83/0.60	thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X1274:hF_Mirabelle_hf, X1275:hF_Mirabelle_hf]:(((hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X1274 @ X1275)!=(zero_z189798548lle_hf))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])).
0.83/0.60	thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X852:hF_Mirabelle_hf, X853:hF_Mirabelle_hf]:(((hF_Mirabelle_hpair @ X852 @ X853)=(hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ (hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X852 @ zero_z189798548lle_hf) @ (hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ (hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X852 @ (hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X853 @ zero_z189798548lle_hf)) @ zero_z189798548lle_hf)))), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])).
0.83/0.60	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ((hF_Mirabelle_hpair @ x @ y)=(zero_z189798548lle_hf)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])).
0.83/0.60	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X1:hF_Mirabelle_hf, X2:hF_Mirabelle_hf]:(((hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X1 @ X2)!=(zero_z189798548lle_hf))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
0.83/0.60	thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X1:hF_Mirabelle_hf, X2:hF_Mirabelle_hf]:(((hF_Mirabelle_hpair @ X1 @ X2)=(hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ (hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X1 @ zero_z189798548lle_hf) @ (hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ (hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X1 @ (hF_Mirabelle_hinsert @ X2 @ zero_z189798548lle_hf)) @ zero_z189798548lle_hf)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.83/0.60	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ((hF_Mirabelle_hpair @ x @ y)=(zero_z189798548lle_hf)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.83/0.60	thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X1:hF_Mirabelle_hf, X2:hF_Mirabelle_hf]:(((hF_Mirabelle_hpair @ X1 @ X2)!=(zero_z189798548lle_hf))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
0.83/0.60	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11]), ['proof']).
0.83/0.60	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.83/0.60	# Parsed axioms                        : 376
0.83/0.60	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 217
0.83/0.60	# Initial clauses                      : 250
0.83/0.60	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 7
0.83/0.60	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 243
0.83/0.60	# Processed clauses                    : 395
0.83/0.60	# ...of these trivial                  : 25
0.83/0.60	# ...subsumed                          : 93
0.83/0.60	# ...remaining for further processing  : 277
0.83/0.60	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 45
0.83/0.60	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.83/0.60	# Backward-subsumed                    : 2
0.83/0.60	# Backward-rewritten                   : 2
0.83/0.60	# Generated clauses                    : 980
0.83/0.60	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 613
0.83/0.60	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.83/0.60	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.83/0.60	# Paramodulations                      : 931
0.83/0.60	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.83/0.60	# NegExts                              : 0
0.83/0.60	# Equation resolutions                 : 50
0.83/0.60	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.83/0.60	# Total rewrite steps                  : 386
0.83/0.60	# ...of those cached                   : 284
0.83/0.60	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.83/0.60	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.83/0.60	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.83/0.60	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.83/0.60	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.83/0.60	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.83/0.60	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.83/0.60	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.83/0.60	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.83/0.60	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.83/0.60	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.83/0.60	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.83/0.60	# Current number of processed clauses  : 111
0.83/0.60	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 29
0.83/0.60	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
0.83/0.60	#    Negative unit clauses             : 12
0.83/0.60	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 68
0.83/0.60	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 603
0.83/0.60	# ...number of literals in the above   : 1243
0.83/0.60	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.83/0.60	# Current number of archived clauses   : 148
0.83/0.60	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2408
0.83/0.60	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1987
0.83/0.60	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 69
0.83/0.60	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 48
0.83/0.60	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.83/0.60	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 94
0.83/0.60	# BW rewrite match successes           : 71
0.83/0.60	# Condensation attempts                : 395
0.83/0.60	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.83/0.60	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 27112
0.83/0.60	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 5837
0.83/0.60	
0.83/0.60	# -------------------------------------------------
0.83/0.60	# User time                : 0.034 s
0.83/0.60	# System time              : 0.010 s
0.83/0.60	# Total time               : 0.044 s
0.83/0.60	# Maximum resident set size: 3220 pages
0.83/0.60	
0.83/0.60	# -------------------------------------------------
0.83/0.60	# User time                : 0.043 s
0.83/0.60	# System time              : 0.013 s
0.83/0.60	# Total time               : 0.056 s
0.83/0.60	# Maximum resident set size: 2340 pages
0.83/0.60	% E exiting
0.83/0.60	% E exiting
0.83/0.60	EOF